FAANG – Review of 2019 Performance

** Intended for New Graduates **

(Click on the image to enlarge)

Wendy, a new college graduate with a major in Economics, is interviewing for the Market Analyst position.

Question # 1
Interviewer: Do you know what the acronym 'FAANG' stands for?

Wendy: Yes, it refers to five major stocks: Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google. In fact, I follow all of them very closely.

Question # 2
Interviewer: Okay, now take a look at the FAANG table and give us your interpretation of its overall performance.

Wendy: Obviously, Apple has hugely outperformed the other four components. While Facebook and Google produced fairly good returns, they were nonetheless below the S&P 500's 2019 return of 30%. Unfortunately, Amazon's return was sub-par while Netflix disappointed its investors. 

Question # 3
Interviewer: Why do you think we've added the Coefficient of Variation (COV)?

Wendy: COV is a very common metric used to demonstrate the volatility of asset classes and components. Amazon was the least volatile component while Apple was the most volatile in the FAANG complex.  

Question # 4
Interviewer: By simply glossing over the data series, would you have known that Apple was the most volatile in the complex?

Wendy: Yes, by simply looking at the data series I could have found it out. It has a much wider spread in the series than the rest, resulting in the highest COV and the volatility.


Question # 5
Interviewer: Was that the right use of the COV metric?

Wendy: It's perfectly fine in an interview setting. If I were compiling a report for a client, I would go back to the daily closing data, at least the weekly closing.

Question # 6
Interviewer: Okay, now switch to the Apple vs. Facebook chart and compare and contrast their performances. 

Wendy: They moved more or less in tandem during the first half of the year. Since then they produced significantly different performances. While Apple continued on a linear  growth path, Facebook moved sideways, remaining mostly range bound.

Question # 7
Interviewer: In terms of the market behavior, do you notice any similarity or dissimilarity between Amazon and Google?

Wendy: Yes, very dissimilar behavior. During the first half of the year, Amazon produced a nice run-up, while Google continued to decline. They however reversed courses in the second half.

Question # 8
Interviewer: Now let's move on to the Amazon chart. What is the point of overlaying the 2-month moving average trendline?

Wendy: To introduce a level of smoothing. It smooths out the noises that are inherent in month-over-month data series. For instance, the moving average trendline here is proving that the April and May data points are somewhat aberrations.   

Questions # 9
Interviewer: How would you graph all five components into one graph?

Wendy: By showing the month-over-month +/- growth rates, so they are apples-to-apples. 

-Sid Som, MBA, MIM
President, Homequant, Inc.
homequant@gmail.com

Link to the Book

How did Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) Fare in 2019?

** Intended for New Graduates **

(Click on the image to enlarge)

Jason is interviewing for Senior Research Analyst with a major brokerage house.

Interviewer
Question # 1: How would you interpret the 2019 DJIA trend?

Jason: Visually, it's a linear trend. It has been trending at 45 degree. 

Interviewer
Question # 2: When you say 'Visually,' do you mean there could be a better technical trend?

Jason: Yes, a polynomial trend would show better fit with significantly higher r-squared. Yet, I would stick to the linear trend as it would be easier to explain to the general clientele.  

Interviewer
Question # 3: What is the missing piece between these two graphs? Or, is there one?

Jason: Volatility. While the Weekly one depicts the market volatility, the Monthly one irons it out. 

Interviewer
Question # 4: Is there another way to depict the market volatility? If so, would that make the volatility case any stronger?

Jason: The Daily closing graph will show higher volatility but it won't make a better case than the Weekly one. As you know, a level of smoothing -- which the Weekly one incorporates -- is a better way to present volatility to the general clientele. 

Interviewer
Question # 5: What market event is common in these two graphs?

Jason: The precipitous market drop in May, bringing Dow under 25,000. Of course, by early July, Dow climbed to a new high, crossing the 27,000 mark. 

Interviewer
Question # 6: Do you think the May correction was driven by basic fundamentals of the market?

Jason: No. It was more news driven like trade, tariffs, etc. than pure market fundamentals. 

Interviewer
Question # 7: How did you come to the conclusion that it was news-driven rather than fundamentals-driven?

Jason: Had it been fundamentals driven, the correction would have lasted much longer. Instead, you can see the immediate V-shaped recovery leading to new market highs.

Interviewer
Question # 8: What is the difference between the 2-period and 3-period moving averages in the above graphs?

Jason: The 3-period in the Weekly graph points to 3-week moving average, whereas the 2-period in the Monthly refers to 2-month moving average.

Interviewer
Question # 9: Would you advise your clients to continue to pour in money in Dow in Q1-2020? 

Jason: Selectively. I will continue to recommend the Dow components with high dividend payouts. I will also urge them to keep some cash handy, just in case a correction occurs, leading to good buying opportunities.

-Sid Som, MBA, MIM
President, Homequant, Inc.
Homequant@Gmail.com

Link to the Book